Quantum
Quest

Algorithms, Math, and Physics

Semi-classical and quantum models in optics

In my exploration of the intricate world of optics, I have explored deeply the semi-classical and quantum models to understand how light interacts with matter. This article presents a comparative look at these two approaches, focusing on their theoretical frameworks and practical implications, particularly in the realms of the photoelectric effect and photon detection probabilities.

Semi-classical model of optics

In the semi-classical model, light is considered as modes of the electromagnetic field, described by a sum over different modes:

\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \sum_\lambda \mathcal E_\lambda(0) \mathbf{e}_\lambda e^{i(\mathbf{k}_\lambda \cdot \mathbf{r} -\omega_\lambda t)} + \text{c.c.}

This model simplifies the interaction between a classical electromagnetic field and quantized atomic electrons. The interaction Hamiltonian, which represents the interaction between the electric field and the quantized electrons, is given by:

\mathbf{H} = -\mathbf{D} \cdot \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)

Where \mathbf{D} is the quantum electric dipole moment. This approach is especially useful for describing phenomena such as the photoelectric effect, where electrons are ejected from a material due to the absorption of light with a frequency above a certain threshold.

Quantum model of optics

Transitioning to the quantum model, light itself is quantized in this framework. Here, even the electromagnetic field is treated as an operator. This model is crucial for describing scenarios where classical physics fails, such as the behavior of single photons. The interaction between quantized light and matter is described using a quantized version of the electromagnetic field. The interaction Hamiltonian, which accounts for the interaction between the quantized electric field and the quantized atomic structure, is expressed as:

\mathbf{H} = -\mathbf{D} \cdot \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t)

Here, \mathbf{D} represents the quantized electric dipole moment of the atom, and \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) is the quantized electric field, treated as an operator in this framework. Although this formula resembles the semi-classical Hamiltonian in form, its implications are profoundly different, as both the dipole moment and the electric field are operators. This quantization changes the behavior of the system, especially in how measurements and interactions at the quantum level are understood and predicted.

The average of the observable electric field is zero, which is evident from:

\langle \mathbf{1}_\lambda | \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}) | \mathbf{1}_\lambda \rangle = 0

However, this does not mean there are no fluctuations. The variance in the electric field gives us an insight into the quantum nature of light:

\Delta E = \sqrt{\langle \mathbf{1}_\lambda | \mathbf{E}^2(\mathbf{r}) | \mathbf{1}_\lambda \rangle}

Practical implications and experimental considerations

In practical terms, understanding these models allows for better design and interpretation of experiments involving light-matter interactions. For instance, in photodetection, the quantum model predicts different outcomes compared to the semi-classical model, especially when considering the detection probabilities of multiple photons.

The semi-classical model would suggest that the probability of detecting two photons independently is simply the product of the probabilities of detecting each photon. However, the quantum model introduces correlations between these events due to the quantum nature of light.

Conclusions and further reading

By studying these models, I’ve gained deeper insights into the fundamental interactions between light and matter, crucial for advancing technologies in quantum computing and optical communication. The semi-classical model offers simplicity and intuition, while the quantum model provides accuracy and prediction power in scenarios where classical physics is inadequate.

For more insights into this topic, you can find the details here.